If that isn’t exactly the way you like to think or do your job, too bad.
#Archicad revit software#
The main thing is this: BIM software is some software engineer’s interpretation of how an architect does his job, and it’s rigidly built into the application. Once and a while, I’ve gone to presentations on ArchiCAD updates, and I have to say it has improved. In 2003, I picked up ArchiCAD and SketchUp and was experimenting with both, and, after a few years, dropped ArchiCAD altogether in favor SketchUp. ArchiCAD appeared on the scene right on the heels of Architrion, but it has survived to today. My first foray into BIM was with Architrion in the late 1980’s when I was trained to be a trainer, but by 1990~91 I gave up on it as not ready for real world projects. I think it would be better to pitch SketchUp as the choice for the star designer the student who stands out as the best designer in the class, and wants software with the greatest flexibility and design freedom that will carry through a career, not just a job. Sorry to say, but students learn REVIT primarily for the prospect of getting hired out of school, despite the fact that SketchUp’s advertising campaign is currently trying to make that claim. That’s not saying much about powers of design creativity. REVIT is most credited for helping to work out construction details with features like clash detection between structural and mechanical elements. General impressions: REVIT is the preference of large firms doing big projects, while ArchiCAD appeals to small to medium sized firms. In more recent years, I would say the use of REVIT among them has grown, and SU shrunk a little, and I’ve seen better design work done in REVIT, so I can’t say it’s such a striking contrast anymore. Several years ago, I would say it was quite consistent that the more creative designs were done in SketchUp (I could usually tell SU output before even asking), while the work done by by students in REVIT were, well, rather uninspired designs. Over the course of several years sitting on Masters of Architecture thesis juries, I often asked what software the students used. See Load and Modify an IFC Mapping File.I’m not a current user of either program, so I can’t directly answer this, but I can make a few comments and throw SketchUp into the mix. (For example, Revit walls export as ifcWalls.) Other Revit families (such as escalators) require that you map them to IFC containers before exporting. These do not require any specific user action to export them. Many standard Revit elements have corresponding IFC containers. Those containers include parameters that have meaningful values. IFC uses architecturally meaningful containers to describe real-world building objects. Similarly, in Revit you can import an IFC file, create a RVT file, and work on the building model in Revit.
The drawing can be opened and worked on in the non-native application. You can export the building model using the IFC format to an IFC-certified application that does not use the RVT file format. When you export a Revit building information model to IFC format, the information can be used directly by other building specialists, such as structural and building services engineers.įor example, building information models developed with Revit are saved to the RVT file format. Updates are available from the Autodesk App Store they need to be downloaded and installed manually.
The Revit IFC Exporter is actively updated to contain new functionality and bug releases on a regular basis. For import (link only), Revit also supports IFC files based on the bSI IFC4 standard.įor export, Revit supports the following standards: IFC4, IFC2x3, and IFC2x2. Revit provides fully certified IFC import and export based on buildingSMART® IFC data exchange standards.įor import (to open or link an IFC file), Revit supports IFC files based on the following buildingSMART International (bSI) data exchange standards: IFC2x3, IFC2x2, and IFC2x.
0 kommentar(er)
